26 November 2008

The Gift of the Stranger

In their refreshing and helpful book, The Gift of the Stranger: Faith, Hospitality, and Foreign Language Learning, David I. Smith and Barbara Carvill write,
We will respond to various notions of what foreign language learning is all about with three simple assumptions and three related questions in mind. The first assumption is that, as we go about our educational tasks, we work with an implicit or explicit picture of the kind of person we would like to see leave our classroom. We seek to have some effect, however slight, on the learners who pass through our care; we want them to develop in a certain direction. The first question, then, is this: What kinds of persons do the proponents of varying motives for doing foreign language learning want their students to become?

Our second assumption is that it is not adequate to view language learning simply as a self-enclosed end in itself, something that can take place without reference to an outside world or to the speakers of the language studied. As foreign language educators, we are, among other things, enabling learners to come into some kind of relationship with speakers of the target language. The second question, then, is: What kind of relationship to members of the target culture do advocates of these different motives have in mind?

Our third assumption is that sharing a world with fellow humans who are created in God's image and who are linguistically and culturally diverse has something to do with the reason for making foreign language learning part of education. The time-honored habit of dividing the world into members of our culture, on the one hand, and lesser beings of inferior importance on the other, is not ... consonant with a Christian worldview. This leads to the third question: Does the motive under consideration honor the stranger as one created in God's image, as one who hopes, thinks, suffers, trusts, and weeps, and whose sighs and laughter are just as audible to God as our own?
These assumptions and questions are part of the framework the authors develop in the service of their overall vision for foreign language teaching and learning--"being a blessing as a stranger and practicing hospitality to the stranger."

Students listed English-language words that
have made their way into Russian


Meanwhile, more snow --Elektrostal city hall,
yesterday


They root their vision in an interpretation of the Babel story in Genesis, the story of Pentecost in Acts, and other Biblical passages, that emphasizes God's delight in diversity and God's sovereign disapproval of imperial arrogance (as demonstrated, for example, by Babel's builders). With special attention to a 17th-century educational reformer I'd barely heard of, Comenius, Smith and Carvill show that a humane and God-centered understanding of foreign language instruction has deep roots in Christian intellectual tradition.

They go on to apply their three assumptions and three questions in a review of the various reasons currently used to sell foreign language learning--appealing to "The Entrepreneur," "The Persuader," "The Connoisseur," "The Tourist," "The Escapologist," "The Revolutionary." There are redemptive aspects to all of these motivations, but mostly they are oriented around "profit, pleasure, and power" for the learner, rather than developing the capacity to offer healthy hospitality and to be a sensitive stranger.

The last third of their book considers ways to apply their insights in the classroom. I loved the case study of using the history of the anti-Hitler White Rose movement in wartime Germany, as well as a Bonhoeffer poem, as ways of conveying even very basic German language instruction in a powerfully humane context. The whole book is like that--a thoughtful and fertile Christian reflection that applies directly to my situation as a stranger in Russia attempting to build a hospitable English-language classroom.



Righteous links: A seriously tantalizing book review of Jenkins' The Lost History of Christianity. ~~ Scot McKnight considers Anne Rice's conversion story, part one, part two. ~~ Tightwad strategies for Thanksgiving! ~~ Two different reflections on the recent Russian film Ostrov (The Island) and what it might say about current interest in spirituality. I saw the film, too, and am still thinking it over.



Ruthie Foster's "Traveling Shoes" take her to a blues cruise on the Caribbean.

20 November 2008

Yalagin winter shorts

Yesterday, we got a hint of snow, but the first significant snowfall came today. Students approved--nearly to a person they agreed that the fall had dragged on too long.

I think it was two winters ago that the first snow did not come until mid-January. Everyone I know here prefers genuine winter with fresh snow rather than the muddy, slushy alternative that gives local credibility to theories of global warming.



My students on Obama: Questions about Barack Obama and the elections have come up frequently at the Institute. Most students who've spoken to me express some optimism about Obama and the improvement of Russian-USA relationships. (It is telling that this is the main concern about American leadership these days.) In two different classes, students expressed caution, in one case reflecting a Russian television program that student had seen, that perhaps Obama was too young, too much of a lightweight. I don't think they realized his actual age; he has an ability to project youthful energy, but he's really middle-aged.

I showed some videos of election night--both mainstream TV coverage of the vote-counting and the Stewart/Colbert alternative. Aside from everything else, we got in a lot of conversational English content. "We project that...", "16% of the precincts reporting...", "John McCain's gameplan...", "bellweather states," "voter suppression" and so on.

One question I always hedge on is "What do you think of our president, Dmitri Medvedev?" I can't think of any analysis that I could make at this point that would add to students' knowledge either of conversational English or of politics, so I usually decline to go beyond a few courteous generalities. However, recently I've pointed out that both Obama and Medvedev are deeply rooted in the study of law and both claim to have deep respect for the rule of law. Based on this shared attitude, we can be optimistic that, when they meet and work together, they'll share an intuitive bond.



"Trying to know Christ in the poverty I see...." Recently, one of Northwest Yearly Meeting's list services has carried a fascinating conversation on simplicity. I appreciated this contribution from Debbie Thomas in Rwanda, and got her permission to include it here:
This discussion leaves me with so many thoughts that I want to share and talk about...These issues are where I live, I'm trying to know Christ in the poverty I see around me and at the same time believing that bringing Christ into that poverty will make a difference on the physical level in many different ways. (while of course having a spiritual impact as well.)

I hardly know where to start...

Even though being a Christian doesn't mean we will prosper financially, God does want his people to have the ability to feed their families. The people I know can't feed their kids more than once a day right now. They are Christians, fully trusting and loving God, working hard too. Christianity here in Africa has largely been spiritual only and hasn't traditionally touched the areas of economics, social relationships, politics, education, etc. Why is that? That's what I'm trying to figure out, and I'm trying to live out a Christianity that does address all those social realities.

[Another participant's] comments tend to lean (I think) towards saying 'use capital to make money then give it to the poor'. That's probably not exactly what he is saying...but I really don't think that's what God is asking of us. It's a horrible thing to have to depend on others to give to you, without ever gaining the ability to get what you need for yourself. It's the difference between giving someone a fish and teaching them to fish. The problem is that it's so painfully difficult to teach someone to fish. And, when you get to the lake, you find that it's been polluted, over-fished, and the poor aren't granted access....

...

What do I see as a viable answer to the question of poverty that all Christians feel somewhat responsible to respond to? We have to be willing to go the long haul with people. To know them, love them, hurt with them and not have answers. To help them think, help them become the kinds of people who can tackle the problems that face them. It's not easy. It's not quick. It's actually rather messy and painful.

For example, right now we have trained 4 teams of Rwandan Christians who volunteer their time to engage over a 3-5 year period with one poor community (so we are doing this in four communities). We don't have any money or projects to give them; we don't even have any answers to their problems. But we can help them to really examine their problems, and their resources, and help them as a community to start tackling some of their problems. We can share with them our hope in Jesus and why we would even take the time to reach out in this way. We can discuss the cultural norms and expectations and lead them through discussion of how they might want to act in different ways.

I've visited communities that have done this in Uganda, they are called transforming communities, it was an absolutely amazing experience. In these transforming villages there was spiritual vitality--meeting in homes, in church, loving God, studying and applying his word...and this spiritual vitality was transforming all aspects of their communities. They had complete food security (while other villages nearby were starving), they sent all their kids to school, they had trained members of their community as health workers and no longer suffered from intestinal parasites and malaria, they had beautiful crops using improved seeds, they raised cattle and drank the milk, they used the fertilizer on their crops.....they were happy, healthy and they loved God fully. They realized that they weren't 'fi nished', there is still a lot of work to do, but they realized that they were able to live in the goodness of God's provisions.

Now isn't that what we are aiming for? Could I ever get enough money from the US or from capital investment to buy that kind of contentment for a community? Never. Are they rich? No. Are they prosperous? In many ways, yes. Are they content? Yes. Much more than many Americans I know. And they, as a community are reaching out to other desperately poor communities helping them to go through this same process.

Ok, so I'm totally off the subject of simplicity. I am passionate about these things, and it thrills my heart to hear other Christian leaders grappling with the same issues. Thank you for wrestling out loud with the issues, so I can benefit too.



A righteous link from Sean Guillory on the media's self-criticism over its coverage of the recent Ossetian war. Interesting comments, too.



Otis Spann and Sunny Boy Williamson on the winter theme: "Nine Below Zero."

13 November 2008

Linux pros and cons

It has been about eight months since I installed Ubuntu's version of the free Linux operating system on my Sony Vaio laptop, and a couple of weeks since I began working with the latest version -- Intrepid Ibex -- which installed itself on my computer during an update session.

I've never had time to become an Ubuntu or Linux insider, so my comments are those of an ordinary computer user who needs the operating system to serve reliably without much knowledge of what's under the hood. Dedicated Linux users form an admirable and interesting worldwide community with its own language and conventions, and they often advocate passionately for both the philosophy and the technical advantages of their work. I've learned just enough about Linux to wish I could be part of that world, but reality dictates that for now I remain a retail-level user.

So here, in plain English and in no particular order, are the main advantages of switching to Ubuntu Linux--particular for a MS Windows user:
  1. My computer boots, runs, executes commands, and shuts down much more quickly. Maybe it's a completely uneducated observation, but my hard drive indicator seems to show less activity.
  2. My computer isn't constantly asking me to spend more money. This is what first drove me over the edge when I turned on my new Sony laptop with its Windows Vista operating system and its panoply of preloaded trial software and "special offers," even its preloaded Spiderman movie (to be unlocked with a credit card). Linux programs are free of cost and of copyright (traditionally understood) and simply carry out their tasks.
  3. All my basic computing tasks are provided for with programs that install themselves along with the Ubuntu Linux operating system--e-mail, instant messaging (using many standard protocols), word processing (including conversion to and from MS Word), database, PowerPoint-style presentations, spreadsheets, image manipulation, audio and video players, Web browser (Mozilla Firefox), Internet and wi-fi connections, CD and DVD burning, and much more. Every update session checks for revisions of not just the operating system, but also these installed programs. For information on the equivalents to MS Office, see www.openoffice.org.
  4. Additional free programs mirror much of what is available for Windows--for example, Skype, Picasa, the VLC Media Player, Scribus for desktop publishing, and Bible software. Ubuntu automatically chooses and installs the various packages of files needed by most of these add-on programs.
  5. You can accept Ubuntu's defaults for desktop appearance and functionality, or you can easily change almost anything. I've added simple desktop controls to switch between Latin and Cyrillic alphabets, to insert áccented letters, to show the weather in Moscow, and so on. If you have time, you can visit forums where other users demonstrate amazing creativity in making their desktops reflect their personality -- and explain how to obtain similar results.
  6. One of Ubuntu Linux's biggest advantages is the ease of installing printers and scanners. Every time I've added a printer or scanner, it has been recognized and installed within seconds. With Windows, I'm asked if I have the original installation disk, and since I'm almost always using secondhand or borrowed equipment, I normally don't have that disk. (And here I'm operating offline most of the time, so downloading drivers is often not convenient.) Even when I did have that disk for one particular scanner, I simply could not make Windows talk to it and had to reboot in Linux to use it. And just today I found that my new Intrepid Ibex does something that Hardy Heron could not seem to do -- it found and installed my USB-connected CDMA broadband modem without any intervention on my part.
Ubuntu is, however, far from the ideal out-of-the-box, totally smooth operating system that would spell doom for bloated commercial systems. Here are some of the obstacles I've encountered:
  1. Licensed and encoded media, such as commercial DVDs, pose a problem for the open-source world of Linux. In the case of DVDs, there is a work-around, but I had to search forums to figure it out and install it. Ubuntu itself is coy about this, probably for legal reasons.
  2. Back when I installed Ubuntu 8.04, Hardy Heron, the operating system did not do a good job of figuring out my laptop's audio hardware. It took me most of a day to figure out how to modify configuration files so that, when I plugged in external speakers and microphones, the audio would be correctly routed. Maybe this has been improved with 8.10, Intrepid Ibex, but during the dialogue boxes that came up while Ibex was installing itself, I made sure to choose to keep old configuration files whenever I was asked. (Those dialogue boxes, unfortunately, were not accompanied by explanations of what stakes were involved in keeping or replacing files.)
  3. At first, using two displays (a huge preference for me) was hard to implement, but updates to Hardy Heron removed this problem.
  4. Windows XP and Vista appear to have a slight edge in resolution and sharpness of fonts.
  5. Finally, there are some Windows programs that I can't duplicate in Linux, and it seems less of a hassle to retain the ability to boot in Windows to use those programs rather than figure out a Linux variant. When I installed Linux, it gave me the choice of a dual-boot installation, which allows me to choose Linux or Windows when I start or restart the computer. I know there are Linux work-arounds such as emulators, but they strike me as requiring more tutoring than I have time for. Right now those programs are MS Access, specifically for an existing database, and iTunes. Everything else I need I can run in Linux. (If you have solutions for those two programs, let me know!)
In fairness to Windows fans, I must say that here in Russia I've met people who seem to be able to manipulate Windows almost the way some Linux fans recompile and fine-tune their programs. Those Windows power users are doing things to their operating systems that Microsoft perhaps never contemplated. But I'm not a power user within either universe, and don't feel apologetic for traveling between them at my convenience. I spend 90% of my time in Linux--that proportion seems just about right.



Today both Judy and I visited Zhanna Grigorievna's fourth-year classroom, and began collecting reactions to the election of Barack Obama as next U.S. president. One day's worth of impressions are not enough, so -- more about such reactions next week.

In the meantime, an item by Matt Mendelsohn is forthcoming on the Martin Marty Center's "Sightings" archive, previewed here in the New York Times.



A simple request from Howlin' Wolf: "Don't talk about me." (With Hubert Sumlin, from this highly recommended DVD: American Folk-Blues Festival: The British Tours 1963-1966)

06 November 2008

Biblical realism

As the U.S. president-elect Barack Obama prepares himself and his leadership team for the tasks ahead, I find my optimism tempered by these sober words from Chris Hedges' elegant rant against fundamentalisms*, both religious and atheist, entitled I Don't Believe in Atheists. [Republished as When Atheism Becomes Religion: America's New Fundamentalists.] 
The prospects for the human race are bleak. The worse things get in human societies, the more powerful the yearning for illusion and false hope. The reality of what we face as a species is increasingly frightening. We cannot stop the destructive forces we have unleashed. We can hope only to lessen the disasters looming before us. This will require a sober, dispassionate response, one that accepts the severe limitations of humanity and gives up utopian fantasies. It will require empathy, the ability to see the world from the perspective of those outside our culture and our nation. Dreams of fantastic miracles and collective salvation, whether through science or God, will accelerate our doom, for they permit us to ignore reality. Our survival as a species depends on accelerating our narrowing possibilities, doing what we can to mitigate disaster, and reaching out to the rest of the planet in ways that promote cooperation rather than conflict.
As Christians, we do have incredibly good news, but it is not the "Good News®" the rest of the world sourly thinks we are peddling. (Why do they think that? Because the heretical celebrities who claim to exemplify Christian certainty indeed peddle it.)

Our good news is, first of all, that we love this planet and its inhabitants with Godly love; and that passionate love fuels our search for ways to meet the challenges and dilemmas listed by Hedges.

Secondly, God has not just granted us, through the Holy Spirit, a share in the divine Love that flows throughout creation. (I envision it as a universal subatomic weak force, never coercing a particular outcome in any case but always drawing us toward ultimate reconciliation.) God has also arranged for us to have (at least!) two awesome resources for discernment: the Bible and each other. The Bible's utter realism about sin (as Hedges points out more than once) inoculates us against destructive certainty. Biblical faithfulness and Christian arrogance are completely incompatible!! And our capacity for relationship, for dialogue, with people inside and outside our communities of faith, means we can draw on a planetary web of observers, thinkers, doers, to study and act. The scientist and the steward need each other; the activist and the contemplative need each other; and who would be better able to point out the mystic's blind spots than the sympathetic cynic?

As much as I resist looking toward larger-than-life heroes to catalyze the global social resources we need to face the future, I do have high hopes for Barack Obama. I hope that he can help us commit ourselves, not to false certainties, utopian fantasies, or a fatal dependence on hero-figures, but to overcoming what Obama himself called our "empathy deficit." May we experience new patterns of dialogue and collaboration in national and global stewardship--and may Quakers, whose values would seem to be completely consistent with this hope, be joyfully in the mix.

.........................
* I continue to protest that the word "fundamentalist" once referred to a specific stream of Christianity, many of whose proponents did not (and still do not) display any of the arrogance and meanness now often associated with the word.



Quaker Friends and Readers Voting Poll: If you are an American Friend (Quaker), Wess Daniels would like to know whether and how you voted in the November 4 elections. He's researching an article for The Friend. The anonymous survey is here; the poll closes on the morning of November 10.



If all goes well, my next post will be from back home in Elektrostal, Russia. We met hundreds of Friends during these six weeks in Oregon and Washington. You gave us so much encouragement--we'll take some of your warmth and energy back with us. Special thanks to Northwest Yearly Meeting staff and the Global Outreach board; Eugene Friends; Metolius Friends; Newberg Friends; Spokane Friends; Ministerios Restauración (Portland); Reedwood Friends.



More election links: From the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life: "How the Faithful Voted." ~~ The experience of one Friendly voter. ~~ And another. ~~ Thanks to Carol Holmes for referring this election commentary from Henry Louis Gates, Jr. ~~ And here's a Kenyan commentary on the substance of Obama-hope, as distinguished from hypocritical hoopla. ~~ Office of the President-Elect: change.gov.

Finally, deep appreciation for Aj Schwanz's moving post. I can't help meditating on the cathartic element in Tuesday's election of Barack Obama--very evidently cathartic for many black people and many white people, but often for different reasons. What would my late mother think?--she of the Germanic "master race" mythology, mother of a murder victim and unable to consider any feature of the murderer of her daughter other than his race? --She who put Swastikas up on our Skokie lawn when the Nazis wanted to march? One common element in many people's Tuesday stories (mine included) is tears. My prayer is that they are tears unto life.

Other links: More biblical realism: weak, beautiful people. ~~ Juan Enriquez on saving the U.S. economy. ~~ Leave it to the Swiss to commemorate John Calvin with chocolate! ~~ Nancy Thomas: "What stands out is the beauty of God's church."



Corey Harris, "Didn't My Lord Deliver Daniel?"
 

Where were you on November 4?