13 February 2025

Occupation: Myrtle Wright's experience

Cover design shows Grini Concentration
Camp main building. Print made by Ole
Olden and smuggled out as his greeting
for Christmas 1941. Nothing can keep a
star from shining.

A couple of weeks ago, I posted "Under occupation" as one of the ways I'm trying to make sense of the current USA presidency and its actions.

A commenter on that post mentioned Myrtle Wright's book Norwegian Diary 1940-1945. I just finished re-reading it, to my great benefit.

On April 9, 1940, Wright was a Quaker peace worker who happened to be on her fourth day of a brief visit to Norway when the Germans invaded that morning. She ended up remaining there for nearly four years. Thirty years later, her account of those years was published by the Friends Peace and International Relations Committee in London. It's now out of print but there are used copies on the market. Online, a Russian translation is available in various formats.

After the initial conquest, the German occupation of Norway seemed relatively mild at first; the occupiers hoped to convince Norwegians that the invasion was simply to protect Norway from the UK's hostile plans. German soldiers conducted themselves correctly, by and large; the German overlords mostly operated behind the facade of the Quisling government and other local collaborators. In summer 1942, the mass arrests of Jewish people began, including a group of Jewish children who became a special concern of Wright and her friends. Executions were more frequent, private radios were outlawed on pain of death, labor conscription began (often destined for Germany). The occupation became much harsher. As life in Norway became more and more complicated under these conditions, Wright began keeping a diary starting in June 1942 in order to record and remember significant events, travels, and contacts as they happened. The first four chapters of her book were written after the war, and cover her arrival in Oslo, the German invasion, the famous teachers' and pastors' acts of resistance. After those first four chapters, the contemporary diary itself begins, and takes up most of the rest of her book.

The book was published in 1974, the very year I became a Friend. In 1975, after my visits to Moscow and Leningrad, I spent a couple of weeks with my grandparents in Oslo. On Sundays I attended the Oslo Friends Meeting, and there I met some of the people whose names come up in Wright's book, and visited some of the locations she described.

Norwegian Diary reminded me of Patricia Cockrell's more recent Sketches from a Quaker's Moscow Journey. In both cases, much of their service consisted of making and keeping appointments, arranging meetings, carrying food, money, clothing, and letters, dealing with bureaucracy, responding to emergencies, and observing discretion in risky situations. The level and character of repression differ between the two cases, but, sadly, that gap is narrowing.

I wondered—what might Myrtle Wright have recorded in her book that we might find interesting in our present situation? Here are some of her observations on living in an occupied country.

The importance of community. Even after being unexpectedly trapped in a country under occupation, Myrtle Wright was not alone. Her overlapping networks—including Quakers, Women's International League for Peace and Freedom, and Old Woodbrookers (alumni/ae of Woodbrooke College in Birmingham, England), and their families and friends—were sources of mutual support. Although at the start of her story, Oslo had just one Quaker member, there were frequent opportunities for worship with likeminded people. Occasionally Wright was able to travel to Stavanger, the historic center of Norwegian Quaker life.

The importance of information. After the German authorities confiscated private radios upon pain of death, Norwegians listened to BBC news and similar sources on hidden radios at great personal risk, and then passed along war news by word of mouth and through underground newspapers—also a very risky business. Information about arrests, prisoner transport, and incarcerations, about the underground railroad to Sweden (its departures, arrivals in Sweden, failures and betrayals) needed to circulate under the noses of the occupiers. The book gives several examples of the code words used by the resistance. Despite all the impediments, Norwegians found ways to keep themselves informed. One example: the amazing story of the White Rose circle in Germany became known in Norway.

Pacifists' dilemmas in war and occupation. Myrtle Wright and many of her friends were committed pacifists, yet (as she writes eloquently) they understood that Allied successes on the battlefield would hasten the end of the war. Within Norway, most people agreed that nonviolence was the only basis for resistance, but many people quietly cheered the Allies' advances in the USSR, (Stalingrad is often mentioned), North Africa, Italy, and France. With these wartime realities, Wright and her friends preferred to discuss postwar visions of freedom, justice, and the growth of empathy without distinctions.

War and occupation create understandable bitterness. The pacifist outlook, as expressed by Wright and many of her friends, not only made violent resistance unacceptable, it also helped them preserve empathy (for example) for the German cities being bombed by the Allied air forces. Such spiritually grounded empathy was nothing if not universal, and would be badly needed when the time for repair and restoration would come, as these circles believed it would.

The value of humor. Humor has the power to build community, point out awkward truths, reward divergent thinking, and restore perspective.

Myrtle Wright tells this story from Grini concentration camp:

At Christmas the prisoners had decorated the barracks and Per Krohg had painted a frieze. Fehmer, from the Gestapo ... came to inspect. He was evidently impressed and stopped in front of Per Krohg's frieze with the remark, "It is remarkable what a primitive nation can produce under German control." This became a byword in Grini and, when prisoners were digging ditches in slow temple or on some other work, they would say to each other, "It is wonderful what a primitive nation can produce when under German control."

The importance of rest. The constant demands on Wright and her friends eventually brought them to the very limits of their energy. As the war went on and restrictions on travel increased, it became harder and harder to do the usual Norwegian thing—hiking on mountain paths, along rivers, on glaciers, in meadows ... and away from the streses of daily life. Some of the most beautiful passages in Wright's book describe these wonderful escapes, even as they find their movements being more and more restricted by the occupation.

There are few direct parallels between the occupation that Myrtle Wright experienced and the looming threats to democracy in the USA, but I think that some of the values and capacities that aided her and her friends remain valid for today's resistance.


July 10 Saturday (from Norwegian Diary, 1943).

Landing on Sicily—the news has gone round like lightning and spirits rise at once. Everyone adds a few more details until there is no more to tell, and rumour does the rest. At least this is another step, and a long-awaited one. A pacifist, what should she think? Many lives will be lost, but every day of delay means more lives, to say nothing of illness and misery. The fury of this disease of violence is not likely to abate without much more loss of life, and, therefore, can one feel a little relief if only the end draws nearer? The physical death of the soldier cannot be worse than the torturing decay of the concentration camp, or the ghetto, or the terror of the civil population in the bombed towns. But physical death is not the ultimate test—what of the spirit which is bread in the warring nations and the occupied countries? We at least can do nothing to stop the fury of the armed warfare; our job lies in another direction and is quite clear, if only we can get it done. We have to prepare the minds of men for the moment when they again have choice and can by their actions, determine the way the peace shall be built; or will the end of the outward war show that Nazism, beaten in the battlefield, has won a victory in men's hearts?

Myrtle Wright (Norw.) married Quaker educator Philip Radley in 1951 and was then known as Myrtle Radley. She died in 1991. More about Myrtle and Philip.


Meanwhile, in Russia: Meduza's Lilia Yapporova and colleagues survey the realities and dysfunctions of the Russian opposition inside and outside Russia.

Trump and Musk aren't just tiptoeing toward autocracy.

Pope Francis denounces inhumanity to refugees.

From Tim Gee at Friends World Committee for Consultation, a letter to Friends for 2025.

Friday PS: "They won't let me down." On the anniversary of Navalny's death.


Evan Nicole Bell performs Albert King's classic "Crosscut Saw."

06 February 2025

Occupation Shorts

Last week, I proposed "under occupation" as a way of absorbing what the new Trump regime was imposing on us, and considering how to respond. I'm not going to try to list all the developments since then, that, taken together, feel like a occupation—you know as much as I do about all that. Here are just a few reflections, with references, on the past week.

  • Lawsuits: In my list of links last week, I included a lawsuit challenging a U.S. Department of Homeland Security policy change. That change allows DHS to invade "sensitive locations" such as places of worship, schools, and hospitals in order to arrest immigrants suspected of violating the law. The lawsuit was filed on behalf of Philadelphia Yearly Meeting of Friends, New England Yearly Meeting of Friends, and Baltimore Yearly Meeting of Friends, along with two congregations within Baltimore Yearly Meeting.

    Since then, several other faith communities have joined the lawsuit, including New York Yearly Meeting. In that same list of links, I provided a link to this legal challenges tracker. At that point it listed 24 lawsuits challenging various executive actions of the Trump administration. As of today, the number of complaints has grown to 37.

  • The favored religion: Today, in a document entitled "Eradicating Anti-Christian Bias," Donald Trump announced that his administration "will not tolerate anti-Christian weaponization of government or unlawful conduct targeting Christians. The law protects the freedom of Americans and groups of Americans to practice their faith in peace, and my Administration will enforce the law and protect these freedoms. My Administration will ensure that any unlawful and improper conduct, policies, or practices that target Christians are identified, terminated, and rectified." (More in Reuters' coverage.) I wonder, will this protection extend to Catholics and Lutherans defending migrants, or "nasty" Episcopal bishops who preach the Gospel in the president's presence? And what about our neighbors who peacefully practice other religions, or none?

    The executive order mentions religious freedom in general several times, but the heavy emphasis (judge for yourself) is on eradicating anti-Christian bias. The Biden administration is charged with "an egregious pattern of targeting peaceful Christians, while ignoring violent, anti-Christian offenses." The charges include the completely coincidental timing of Easter Sunday 2024 and "Transgender Day of Visibility." I can't help suspecting that to score points with a crucial part of his base, Trump might actually contribute to a whole new wave of genuine anti-evangelical bias as religious and secular people alike absorb this embarrassing enmeshment of government with the Christian knockoffs that suit this cruel and irreligious regime.

  • Ethnic cleansing, American style: Joe Biden's active participation in the rubbishing of the Gaza Strip was bad enough, but here comes Donald Trump with an amazing new embellishment: remove the whole population and create a "Riviera of the Middle East"! Meanwhile, as Michael Arria (Mondoweiss) points out, (1) the West Bank may face equal threats, and (2) "A Trump-appointed member of the United States Holocaust Memorial" (Martin Oliner) "has published an Op-Ed calling Palestinians 'fundamentally evil' and not worthy of 'any mercy.'"

  • Meanwhile, up in space: First, another false witness against Joe Biden. Last month, Elon Musk posted on X "that the president [Trump] had asked SpaceX to bring the two 'stranded' astronauts back to Earth. Musk added that SpaceX would do so, and, 'Terrible that the Biden administration left them there so long.' Trump chimed in, "I have just asked Elon Musk and @SpaceX to 'go get' the 2 brave astronauts who have been virtually abandoned in space by the Biden Administration. They have been waiting for many months on Space Station. Elon will soon be on his way. Hopefully, all will be safe. Good luck."

    The actual situation, and the complicated planning and spaceship-swapping involved (no fault of Biden's!) is described by Ars Technica's Eric Berger.

    Secondly, the impossible (and impossibly costly except for the contractors!) promise of an Iron Dome for North America.

  • A history lesson: "What follows is a step-by-step account of how Hitler systematically disabled and then dismantled his country’s democratic structures and processes in less than two months’ time—specifically, one month, three weeks, two days, eight hours, and 40 minutes." Timothy W. Ryback (gift link) in The Atlantic.
  • Rebecca Gordon (Tomdispatch) sums up: King Donald, old and new litanies, and the Faithful Fools.


Heather Cox Richardson's own summary of the occupation's progress, and a few instances of resistance. (Don't blame her for the "occupation" metaphor; it's mine.)

Speaking of the West Bank, here's this week's OCHA Humanitarian Situation Update.

A pro-Russian disinformation source produced a video discrediting USAID, and apparently Elon Musk and Donald Trump, Jr., have taken the bait.

Becky Ankeny has been speaking to Silverton Friends Church about the crucifixion of Jesus. Last month she spoke about the resurrection.

Micah Bales at Berkeley Friends Church on Jesus and his inaugural sermon.... "'All spoke well of him and were amazed at the gracious words that came from his mouth.' Wow, what a guy! He’s going to make Israel great again." Shouldn't he have stopped while he was ahead? More to the point: What has God anointed him to do? And are we ready, not just to admire, but to follow?

Greg Morgan, Elderchaplain: "Religious faith is an important source of peace for many facing death, but it’s no guarantee...."

Once again, an invitation to join our weekly online prayer meeting for peace, under the care of Friends World Committee for Consultation, Europe and Middle East Section. Every Tuesday, 1:30 p.m. London time. See this page for more information.


Christone "Kingfish" Ingram and his band perform "662."

30 January 2025

Under occupation

For the past two days, the new Trump administration has been demonstrating that it is far easier to break things than it is to build them.

— Heather Cox Richardson, January 22.

Keeping track of all that breakage may be a practical and emotional challenge. For the practical side of things, there are resources:

Less convenient: keeping up with the news. (Did you see this item on California water?) Maybe it's less important to scan for every single scandal that comes along, but cultivate the reflex to fact-check dubious and polarizing claims from those in power, as well as self-styled heroes of the resistance.

Politicians in the Democratic party are far from united in how to cope with all this breakage. Here are some thoughts from a trusted commentator:

... [T]here's a whole debate raging in the Democratic Party of what to do about Trump, with an early consensus forming that we can't just be the party of "the resistance" forever,  (nbcnews.com)  and I can see that point—pussy hats don't necessarily appeal to your average swing voter—but I think it's misguided, because the Republican Party is no longer a normal political party, it's a cult of fealty to their God-Emperor and if the Democrats don't push back with every tool in the toolbox, the Democratic Party will be banned (designated a terrorist organization or something), and there will be little room for discussing the finer points of Trump's economic agenda. Likewise, tuning out the "culture war" makes sense in some ways (although it misreads the moment—Harris never ran on culture-war issues, and she still lost), but the now-typical Democratic line that trans issues are a "distraction" from kitchen-table issues isn't quite right, because to the Republicans, trans issues are just the early fault line they're using to cleave apart America's multiracial democracy. Democrats need to push back on every issue, gum up the works in every way they can, because picking and choosing your battles right now may make some sense on a messaging level (no reason to chase after every single perceived Trump slight) but it makes no sense on the level of the political machinations of our fragile republic.

Coping emotionally may be just as big a challenge as keeping informed. (By the way, I was fascinated by Ashley Parker's article on the apparent competition in Washington, DC, to be at the top of the persecuted list.) Yes, "shock and awe" may be the tactic, but I'm looking for a more systemic metaphor to help me absorb and respond to what's going on.

That's where "under occupation" comes in.

Hebron, Palestine. Graffiti. 2019.

"Occupation" implies an alien power imposing control on us. "Alien" is a loaded term—I remember when I was an alien here—and I can't really claim that Donald Trump and his team are from outside the U.S. (with a few exceptions), despite their apparent affinities with certain authoritarian leaders on the global stage. And racism and nativism are certainly not new to America.

Here's the "alienation": MAGA priorities seem to diverge so dramatically from the generally bipartisan postwar consensus in favor of equal rights, free trade, workplace safety, educational reforms, greater access to health care, international collaboration and collective security, independent civil service and judiciary, and at least some improvements in energy and environmental policies, that the word "alien" may not be too far off the point. Any ideal that isn't linked to myth-based nationalism is dismissed or ridiculed.

All of these areas of postwar progress are now under simultaneous and coordinated (if at times sloppy and chaotic) attack, with potentially disastrous short-term and long term consequences. It's that "simultaneous and coordinated" quality, imposed from a central executive, that I'm comparing to an occupation.

The word "occupation" also implies that this control is coercive, even violent. If we don't think this danger applies to ordinary U.S. citizens minding our own business, we are probably not immigrants, we are likely of northern European background, and we fit into the new administration's preferred gender categories. (Full disclosure: I'm a former alien, an immigrant.) Also, our denial may be based on layers of financial security that most people don't have.

If we are Christians in denial, maybe we've managed to smother our testimonies on wealth, hospitality, and mercy in favor of a dominion agenda.

I don't want to push this "occupied" metaphor too far. It's certainly not perfect. For most of us life is pretty easy in comparison with, for example, Palestine, or Russian-occupied parts of Ukraine. But it does help me think more systematically about how not to inventory obsessively each new piece of evidence of all this breakage, but rather to contribute toward resilient communities of mutual care, communities who welcome the vulnerable people among us.

My father and his extended family lived under actual occupation in Norway (1940-1945), and they told me a lot about what that was like. Some interesting features:

  • Circulating accurate information was a vital service, far riskier in the Nazi years than it is so far in the USA. (Radios were banned, so considerable ingenuity went into concealing them. Alternative newspapers were another source of news—also at great risk.)
  • Teachers, pastors, judges, and other organized groups in Norway learned to practice nonviolent resistance as communities, defining the red lines that most of them would refuse to cross. My cousin Axel Heyerdahl told me how much he had admired his own teachers who joined that campaign.
  • Those who had particular resources (such as isolated cottages to hide fugitives), jobs (my grandfather spent most of his war years in the coastal lifesaving service), and physical stamina could undertake high-risk missions to undermine the occupiers. Smuggling Jewish people and British pilots into Sweden was one example from my own family.
  • In opposition to the resistance movement, there were people who actively supported the occupation. Aside from the actual collaborators at the top, such as Vidkun Quisling, the most famous example might be the great novelist Knut Hamsun. And in between these two groups of committed antagonists, there were thousands of people who simply tried to get along without being noticed by the authorities. Some of those became collaborators for convenience' sake. Some fell in love with enemy soldiers and bureaucrats. Some changed position during the war. 
  • One of my grandfather's concerns as a member of the resistance army was to persuade hotheads not to engage in violence against Germans, which would only result in increased repression. By extension, in our own time, resistance doesn't require demonizing Trump supporters or committing our own sins of rhetorical mayhem. As disciples of the Prince of Peace, we are never allowed to forget that even our "enemies" are made in the image and likeness of God. We pray that their eyes would be opened to their captivity, even as we too seek to be free.
  • During our walking tour of Oslo's World War II and resistance-related sites last summer, our guide pointed out that five years of deprivation—little or no meat, fat, dairy products, etc.—actually led to better health for some people. (Do we see analogues in our own time? Increased capacity to discern priorities? I'm not sure, but I thought I'd ask.)
  • Finally, Germany's thousand-year Reich lasted twelve years in Germany, five years in Norway. Those were very costly years, but they ended.

I've found that the metaphor of occupation helps me to withstand the barrage of bad news, put it all in context, and focus on faith and resilience in community. What metaphors, filters, or tasks are helping you to cope? Where do you find resilience and mutually sustaining friendships?


Three Quaker yearly meetings and two monthly meetings collaborate with Democracy Forward to sue the U.S. Department of Homeland Security over the removal of restrictions against ICE raids on "sensitive locations," specifically places of Quaker worship. Among the plaintiffs: Philadelphia Yearly Meeting and New England Yearly Meeting. Story in Friends JournalComplaint document.

Nancy Thomas has an important strategy for hope.

Kristin Du Mez asks her "fellow enemies" at Christian colleges and universities to consider some implications of the MAGA regime.

In his new substack blog, Quakers and the End of Scapegoating, Tom Gates promises us "Part exploration of Rene Girard's groundbreaking 'mimetic theory,' part Bible commentary, and part dialogue with early and contemporary Quakers."

A conversation with Brian about racism, racial identity, and the "push to choose."

The Doomsday Clock is one second closer to midnight.

Finally, the Daily Quaker Message reminds us: Obey God Only.


"If you walk with Jesus...." More from The Jumping Cats, Moscow.

23 January 2025

1975: From Mississippi to Moscow


My 1975 visit to Russia began even before I left London. Shortly after I boarded Aeroflot's IL-62 to Moscow, before I had taken my seat, the airplane began taxiing. The two seats next to mine were occupied by two delightful middle-aged women who had boarded in San Francisco and who now helped wedge me into my seat. Almost all the floor space was taken up by their numerous bottles and packages of goodies (apparently no need to secure carry-on items!), but after a bit of rearranging, I was fine. Soon they were offering me all kinds of yummy pastries, and insisted on adding cognac to my coffee.

Russia, what will I do with you? You beguiled me from those first moments on the plane and all through the twelve days of my first and only visit during the Soviet era. I knew a lot about your history, including your capacity for cruelty to your own citizens, but your language and culture had been my fascination from my mid-teens on, and now (that is, fifty years ago this year!) I was going to see you for myself. For the most part, I only saw your good sides during those twelve days in 1975, but now you're slipping back into those old ways....

I've mentioned my first visit to Russia several times, but now I'd like to give a few more details, if only to express a bit of the combined nostalgia and grief that accompanies these memories. I choose not to indulge in russophobia, and won't apologize for my life-long fascination, even as I agree with Dmitrii Bykov's sad assessment after the full-scale invasion of Ukraine: "It is clear that Russia crossed many red lines. It cannot live any longer as it did in the past. The world will no longer see [in Russia] a place of spirituality, a place of great culture, a place representing victory over fascism."

Back in this post—Mississippi mellowing?—I wrote about my other significant involvement in 1975, my months at Voice of Calvary in Mendenhall, Mississippi, which were directly followed by my departure for the Soviet Union via the UK. I said then that, between those two places, Mississippi was the larger culture shock.

In the post Sapsan shorts, I mentioned the feeling, during that 1975 visit to Russia, of being so far away from everyone I knew. And in Return to Sergiev Posad, I explained how there was actually a link between those two experiences, Mississippi and Russia, and that link was the American Friends Service Committee.

In that last post, I described my first visit to the city of Sergiev Posad, to the Orthodox campus known as the Trinity Lavra of St. Sergius, back when the city of Sergiev Posad was still known by its Soviet name of Zagorsk. But there I only told the story of our tour group's visit to the worship service in progress. But as we left the service and were on our way to the next stop on the tour, I spoke quietly to our guide, telling her that I wanted to visit the Orthodox seminary if possible. To my surprise and delight, she told me how to get there, and promised to hold the bus for me when the others had completed the planned tour. 

At the seminary, I wasn't sure what kind of reception I would get as a Protestant, possibly a sectarian (Quaker) in their eyes, and moreover as a 22-year-old American with long hair and (to put it charitably) undistinguished clothing. A dignified man who seemed to have the title of "inspector" greeted me very kindly just inside the front door, and soon I was on a fascinating tour of the seminary, while he listened to my story. Everyone along the way treated me as an honored guest! Needless to say, I was walking on air when I rejoined our tour bus, and to this day I wonder what kind of intuition that tour guide had. It's hard to imagine the same thing happening now, but, honestly, who knows?

Churches played a role in several other incidents during those days in Moscow and Leningrad (now St. Petersburg). On my first full day in Moscow, I went to the Novodevichy Convent, in whose cemetery many famous people are buried—Khrushchev, Gogol, Chekhov, Scriabin, and (just before my visit) Shostakovich, among many others. As I approached the convent's gate, I saw an artist at work in a clump of bushes, and his paintings were on the grass, available to purchase. I asked him if he was a believer, and he said, "Of course!" When I asked whether painting was his work, he laughed and said, "I'm a parasite on society." In the language of Soviet sociology, the term meant that he was not usefully employed within the approved structures, but he seemed to enjoy announcing his title! Of course I bought a painting, which is included in the slide show above.

I brought the painting back to my hotel room at the Mozhaiskaya hotel, which was on the Mozhaisk highway beyond the main circular highway around Moscow. The next day, when I returned from my sightseeing in the city center, I found that my painting had been carefully pinned up on the wall. When I asked the service staffer taking care of my room whether she know how the painting got there, she just gave me a quiet smile.

The following Sunday, I decided to go back to Novodevichy Convent for a church service. It was a lovely service, but I noticed that I was about one-third the age of most people there, and one of the few males. Afterwards, outside the church, I was approached by two young women, Lara and Sonya, who wanted to know what possible interest a young person like me could have in attending an Orthodox church service. They were mainly interested in the architecture, they explained. I tried to explain a little about my own faith. We decided to hang out for a while, and they took me to a nearby museum and exhibition. Lara then had to go, so Sonya and I went on to Gorky Park, where Sonya tutored me in the Soviet skill of working two lines at the same time: one for an amusement-park ride, and the other for shashlyk. The only problem: we arrived at the front of both lines simultaneously, so, laughing, we had to try to eat our food while twirling around on the ride.

Every day I ran into interesting people and unplanned encounters. For example, I visited the Kremlin, but the church/museum I wanted to see was closed, so I sat down in a nearby park. Pretty soon a Polish man came up to me and started a conversation. Somehow Zbigniew and I got onto the subject of political humor, and so there we were in the heart of Soviet power, trading jokes about Brezhnev and his tribe.

The hotel. A photo from the 1970's. Source.
Back at my hotel, its restaurant was an important feature of the place; the hotel was very new and was built in a relatively undeveloped area with no nearby urban amenities. (I think it was part of the tourist infrastructure ramp-up to the 1980 Olympics.) But the restaurant also attracted local people, and on one memorable evening, one couple pleaded with me to stay after dinner and hear the band. "They play forbidden music!" I became pen pals with another such new acquaintance, and for a while we traded records. Among other things, he sent me David Tukhmanov's avant-garde record By the Wave of My Memory, and I sent him B.B. King Live in Cook County Jail.

All my travel and transfers (airport to hotel to train to hotel to airport) were part of a package, which for most ordinary private tourists was the only way to visit the Soviet Union. In my case, everything seemed to work well, and in one situation, extraordinarily well: I was already at the train station for my overnight train to Leningrad when I realized, to my horror, that I'd left my Novodevichy painting in my hotel room, still pinned to the wall. No problem! An Intourist staffer got on the phone, and well before my train left, someone met me in the station with my painting securely packed into a tube. Five decades later, it's on our dining room wall in Portland, Oregon, reminding me of the faith of a "parasite," and our shared laughter.


From Leningrad I went to stay with my grandparents in Oslo. A few days later, I got a call from my cousin Johan Fredrik Heyerdahl: would I like to hear a presentation by the writer Andrei Sinyavsky? Of course! Another chance to connect with Soviet reality. Sinyavsky, accompanied by his host in Oslo, the journalist Per Egil Hegge, gave his lecture at the Nobel Institute, and Johan Fredrik and I were there.

Sinyavsky had served six years for anti-Soviet agitation and propaganda. His co-defendant Yuli Daniel had also been sentenced under this same charge—it may have been the first time this charge was applied to fiction. After Sinyavsky 's release, he had eventually emigrated to France where he was a professor of Russian literature. (Per Egil Hegge had his own brush with Soviet power; he was expelled from the USSR while serving as Aftenposten's correspondent in Moscow.)

At the Nobel Institute, Sinyavsky told us that there were three principal types of dissidents in the USSR. Some fought for a nationalist myth or the communist ideal, and sometimes even welcomed their punishment. But Sinyavsky's highest praise was reserved for those, such as Sakharov, who were ready to help anyone without exception, especially for the sake of freedom.

Later, I had my own couple of minutes with Sinyavsky, during which he confirmed something that I thought he'd hinted at in his lecture—that he was a Christian believer. I realized that he also valued being a writer, rather than being stuck in the category of "political dissident."


If you've managed to read this far, thank you for your company! Most of my diaries will probably never see the light of day, but it has been both pleasant and sobering to leaf through some of these pages from 1975.

Now I have a question for you. Are you interested in Russian language or culture or spiritual resources? I'd love to hear from you (privately if you like) because I personally know very few people younger than me, particularly among peace church people, who have this interest. In my desire to accompany spiritually grounded peace people in Russia one way or another (and they do exist), I'd love to think that there are more potential partners out there for this ministry.

I originally got introduced to this whole field because I took Russian language classes in high school. I think the popularity of high school and college Russian language and area studies has shrunk dramatically over the last fifty years, so it's not surprising that this specific concern might attract fewer people, but I figured it was worth asking....

PS: Even if you're not younger than me, I would still love to hear from you!! And if you know someone I should contact, I'd love to reach out. Finally, I'd also love to know whether there are other organized efforts to respond to this concern.


The Guardian's Anna Betts: Mariann Edgar Budde, a bishop and (as it turns out) evangelist for the actual Christian faith.

Some advice for U.S. Catholics on discipleship during Trump 2.0 ... and not just for Catholics.

Sarah Scott speaks to Spokane Friends on grief.


"No hatred will be tolerated." A repeat from one of those earlier posts about Russia. It seems like a song whose time has come again.

16 January 2025

Are we agents of Lucifer?

Source: Matthew D. Taylor, The Violent Take it by Force: The Christian Movement that is Threatening our Democracy

[Lance] Wallnau dabbed frankincense oil onto foreheads, anointing voters into God’s army. Another speaker said that Kamala Harris would be a “devil in the White House.” Others cast Democrats as agents of Lucifer, and human history as a struggle between the godless forces of secular humanism and God’s will for humankind. [Johan's highlighter.]

—Stephanie McCrummen in The Atlantic, The Army of God Comes Out of the Shadows: Tens of millions of American Christians are embracing a charismatic movement known as the New Apostolic Reformation, which seeks to destroy the secular state."

I've been following the mutually exploitive alliance between the segment of Christians sometimes labeled the "New Apostolic Reformation" and all three of Donald Trump's presidential campaigns. About a year ago, I linked to this article by Paul Rosenberg in Salon concerning this movement. The Salon article focused on a book by André Gagné and did a pretty good job in covering the origins and leadership of the NAR.

Then, last week, The Atlantic published Stephanie McCrummen's article on "The Army of God..." from which came my opening quotation. She provides some valuable updates to Rosenberg's Salon article. More importantly, she paints vivid pictures of what the movement looks like on the ground, among people who may not even know that they're part of an academically-labeled New Apostolic Reformation, but have absorbed the goals and culture and clichés of the movement.

Some of this same territory is covered by Keira Butler in the November-December Mother Jones. Her article's title is clearly designed to alarm (as was McCrummen's article!): "Christian Nationalists Dream of Taking Over America. This Movement Is Actually Doing It." Subtitle: "The New Apostolic Reformation is 'the greatest threat to US democracy you've never heard of.'"

Neither Butler nor McCrummen had the space to provide all the details and nuances I might have wanted to see in coverage of the New Apostolic Reformation, but they're among the best surveys I've seen in secular media.

I have a few reflections on all these efforts to wake us up to the dangers of this movement.

What do I mean by "movement"? I'm being purposefully vague. Matthew Taylor, on the Straight White American Jesus Podcast, says that "The New Apostolic Reformation is a network of networks." The diagram at the top of this post shows how he locates the movement within the map of U.S. Christians—nested within the "Apostolic and Prophetic movements," in turn nested within Independent (nondenominational) Charismatics, who are nested within Pentecostal-charismatic movements" (which themselves cross boundaries among Protestant, Roman Catholic, and Orthodox lines). To some extent the "networks" are among leaders, and many participants may not know exactly how their church or pastor links up with the larger movement.

How many people, and what proportion of U.S. Christendom, are we talking about? Matthew Taylor's diagram is not intended to be statistically proportional. Paul Djupe at Denison University has gathered some startling statistics, indicating that well over half of U.S. evangelical Christians, plus substantial numbers of non-evangelicals, agree with most of the main ideas held by people in the NAR. For example, the statement "There are demonic 'principalities' and 'powers' who control physical territory" finds agreement among 69% of surveyed evangelicals and 40% of non-evangelicals.

Are there any Quaker ties to this movement? I'm sure there are individuals who identify with it, but as far as I can tell, no yearly meeting or wider association does so. C. Peter Wagner, sometimes credited with giving the movement its name, has been influential among some Quakers in the USA. Our adult Sunday school class at First Friends, Richmond, Indiana, used his book, Your Spiritual Gifts Can Help Your Church Grow, back in the early 1980's, and found it very helpful. It was originally published well before he became known for advocating the ideas behind the NAR.

Peter Wagner and John Wimber (montage, source.)

You might wonder about John Wimber (former Friends pastor and co-founder of the Vineyard denomination) and NAR, given the close partnership between Peter Wagner and John Wimber, particularly at Fuller Seminary. Wimber's widow, Carol Wimber-Wong, put it in her own tart way: "John didn't believe any of that crap." In that interview, she went on to say, "And he loved Peter.... But they didn't agree on that one point. John couldn't find it in the Scriptures." This clip of a conversation (less than a minute long) is worth viewing. It might help to explain why I personally have never caught a whiff of NAR in the few Vineyard churches I've visited.

When Carol died, earlier this month, the church lost a woman of wit, grace, intelligence, and clarity. This tribute to her includes a video interview with her, in which, among other things, she talked about the Quaker context at the beginning of John Wimber's ministry.

Why have many people "never heard" of NAR? To risk a generalization, the loudest and most obnoxious Christian celebrities have done a lot to make our Christian "good news" seem more like "bad news." People may admire Jesus himself and acknowledge the quiet ministries of care and healing carried out over the world in his name, but the whole subculture of theatrics and condemnation described in McCrummen's and Butler's articles must strike many nonparticipants as grotesque or repulsive, if they notice it at all. Some of that inevitably colors their attitude to Christianity as a whole.

The supernatural claims connected with that subculture's Pentecostal/charismatic context are no doubt part of that perceived grotesqueness. That's a loss. Evil does exist; so do principalities and powers, and demonic strongholds where systemic social injustice has become embedded in very specific territories. I plead for the concepts of spiritual warfare and the "Lamb's War" even as I refuse to use these concepts and vocabulary to slander my political opponents. In the Lamb's War, we don't search for enemies, we search for prisoners—and do everything we can collectively to free them.

(Don't we?)


For the record, we Democrats are not agents of Lucifer. (That is, not by virtue of being Democrats!)


Related:

Wikipedia's interesting survey of the New Apostolic Reformation.

"I was a bit nervous about using the language of spiritual warfare in this post."

George Fox on overcoming corruption.

Ted Grimsrud: Reading the Bible in light of the Lamb's War.

After five years in Russia, graduation shorts.


On the death of our Friend Simon Lamb.

Sociologist Yevhen Holovakha on how Ukrainians' views of the war have been changing.

Benjamin Wittes and Holly Berkley Fletcher on the theology of the Pete Hegseth hearing: Where evangelical culture and porn culture meet; exaggerating credentials or anointing?; repetition of the phrase "warrior ethos."

Contrarian street evangelist: Trump is the antichrist.

Finally, here is a transcript of Joseph Biden's farewell address, including urgent warnings about oligarchy and the defense of democracy. Alternate link (in case it disappears from the White House Web site in a few days!).


McKinley James with one of my favorite Junior Wells songs:

09 January 2025

"You helped five people today"

What do platelets do? "The ligands, denoted by letter L, signal for platelets (P) to migrate towards the wound (Site A). As more platelets gather around the opening, they produce more ligands to amplify the response. The platelets congregate around the wound in order to create a cap to stop blood flow out of the tissue." Source.

I went into the Red Cross platelet center at 11:30 this morning. A little bit after 2 p.m., while I was being disconnected from the apheresis machine that had extracted my platelets and plasma from my blood, the phlebotomist said to me, "You hit the maximum. Three units of platelets, and two units of plasma. You helped five people today."

Looking at what is going on in the world, and what we can anticipate for this new year, I wonder if you and I have some of the same concerns and preoccupations. I've sometimes found my grip on my usual optimism weakening at times. Just as one tiny example: as Los Angeles burns, our president-elect feels it is appropriate to call California's governor "Gavin Newscum."

**Sigh.**

With all of these figurative and literal firestorms around the world weighing on my mind, I can't deny it: the apheresis technician's words were a consolation.

A bit of background: for the last few years, I've been giving platelets at the Red Cross center on North Vancouver in Portland, Oregon, twice a month when we're in town, and when I don't have some disqualifying medical stuff going on. This blood component is in great demand but has a very short shelf life (five days, including the time needed for safety testing). You can donate platelets to the Red Cross up to 24 times a year, at intervals as short as a week between visits. The interval between plasma donations is longer—for me, it's every second platelet visit.

Kind words from the staff and volunteers are balm for the soul, but I admit I also like the practical incentives. Probably half my tee shirt collection is from the Red Cross, along with an assortment of other useful merchandise—a tote bag, backpack, duffel bag, hip pack, insulated mug, umbrella, and some unique socks.

On most occasions, a gift certificate, which I use for books, also follows shortly after the donation session. Right now, donors are also being awarded a chance to get Superbowl tickets. People of greater spiritual maturity than I have can decline such incentives to increase the benefit to the Red Cross.

Part of the reason we platelet donors are appreciated is that (according to the Red Cross publicity materials) less than one percent of the population donates platelets. Many people probably don't know the value of platelets, but among those who do, one discouraging factor may be the fact that for two hours or more the donor must stay more or less immobile, with blood being drawn from one arm and returned into the other. During that process, neither arm can be moved, and the fist on the outbound side needs to squeeze a rubber ducky (no noisemaker!) or similar squeezy item every few seconds—so no napping.

Maybe you're thinking, a two-hour motionless period ought to be no sweat for a Quaker, but the honest truth is that for most of my visits as a donor, I've not been observing traditions of spiritual discipline as they're usually conceived. I've been streaming old episodes of Frasier on my tablet. Our donation center has very good Wi-Fi. I can usually watch about six episodes in one sitting.

Once out of every five or ten visits, I get turned down during the mini-checkup before the procedure. Usual reason: low iron (minimum score for men is 13, for women is 12.5). Sometimes my pulse is running slowly; the minimum beats per minute is 50. There are also minimums and maximums for blood pressure.

Today I was listening to the Red Cross receptionist as she welcomed a first-time platelet donor. The newcomer explained that, at work, he gets a four-day weekend every month, which gives him an opportunity to become a regular monthly donor. If you're in a similar situation, maybe I'll see you there. Together we can boost the number of people who get the plasma and platelets they need to recover ... or simply stay alive.


My unofficial comments about donating platelets are from my own personal experience and don't cover every aspect of eligibility and procedures. For those details, go directly to the Red Cross.


Krista Alvarez remembers Norval Hadley. I first met Norval during his years at World Vision. Some years later, at a prayer concert, we had a conversation about the 1994 bloodbath in Rwanda, and he said that he regretted that Quaker evangelism in central Africa had not put sufficient emphasis on the peace testimony. His memorable words about the importance of Quaker discipleship: "The body reflects the beauty of the Head."

Greg Morgan on endocarditis and difficult encounters in chaplaincy: "We're all human."

Conscientious objection: how can we Quakers support our young people? A Quaker Religious Education Collaborative conversation circle, scheduled for January 21 and 23.

Meanwhile in Russia, you may have noticed that "the number of words you can say keeps shrinking."


Jimmy Carter's state funeral at the National Cathedral, and private funeral at Maranatha Baptist Church, Plains, Georgia. Video coverage is available on the C-SPAN Web site.

Today, here in the USA, it's a national day of mourning for Jimmy Carter. I saw parts of the state funeral in Washington, DC, and the private funeral in Plains, Georgia. Here was a man who helped millions, both spiritually and practically (if such a distinction exists).

Heather Cox Richardson summarizes the day.

John Fea: "There was a different kind of 'power' on display here."

At the funeral in Plains, Joanna Maddox sings "Let There Be Peace on Earth..."